TABC Establishes On-Site Consumption Rule: A Sensible Alignment

The Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission has established a new rule aligning on-site hemp consumption with on-site alcohol consumption. Simply put: if alcohol cannot be consumed on-site at a location, hemp cannot be consumed on-site there either. This is a sensible, non-controversial regulatory alignment that demonstrates the state’s broader direction of treating cannabis-adjacent products more like other regulated consumables. Not every alcohol regulation will map cleanly onto hemp, but this one does, and its adoption reflects a thoughtful approach to extending existing regulatory infrastructure to an emerging product category.

DSHS Rules, Lawsuits, and the Ping-Pong Court Battle

The Texas hemp regulatory environment has been in near-constant motion since Governor Abbott signed a hemp-related executive order in September 2025. Here is the timeline of what has happened since, because the sequence matters:

  • January 2026 - DSHS publishes proposed rules for consumable hemp products. Industry stakeholders raise significant concerns about THCA classification and fee increases.March 2026DSHS adopts amended rules, which are better than the initial proposal but still problematic. The rules shift the THC testing standard from delta-9-only to total THC (including THCA post-decarboxylation), effectively banning THCA flower and many other products. Licensing fees for manufacturers jump from $258 to $10,000 per facility. Retail registration fees rise from $155 to $5,000.
  • March 31, 2026 - Newly adopted DSHS rules go into effect. Smokable hemp products including THCA flower are effectively banned in Texas.
  • April 8, 2026 - Texas Hemp Business Council (THBC), Hemp Industry and Farmers of America (HIFA), and several Texas hemp businesses file a 330-page lawsuit in Travis County challenging the DSHS rules. Plaintiffs argue agencies exceeded legislative authority by adopting a total THC standard the Legislature explicitly chose not to change during the 89th Session.
  • April 10, 2026 - A Travis County district court grants a Temporary Restraining Order, blocking enforcement of the DSHS rules and allowing all products to be sold. Status quo preserved while litigation continues.
  • May 1, 2026 - Judge Daniella DeSeta Lyttle of the 261st District Court grants a Temporary Injunction, extending protection and blocking four specific rules: the total THC definition change, the ban on cross-state transport of hemp materials, the dramatically increased fees, and the escalating daily penalty structure.
  • May 6, 2026 - The Texas Attorney General files an appeal of the Temporary Injunction. Because the 15th Court of Appeals agrees to consider the state’s appeal, the injunction is automatically stayed and the DSHS rules become enforceable again. Smokable hemp is again banned from Texas shelves.
  • May 8, 2026 - THBC files an emergency motion to reinstate the injunction. The Texas 15th Court of Appeals reinstates the injunction until May 15, 2026.
  • May 15, 2026 - The court will reconsider the injunction. Whatever the court decides on May 15 will likely remain in effect for the duration of the lawsuit, which could span months to years. A full trial is currently set for July 27, 2026.

Watch: May 14, 2026

The 15th Court of Appeals will reconsider the Temporary Injunction on May 15. The outcome will determine whether Texas hemp businesses can continue to sell THCA flower and other products through what could be a lengthy trial process. This is the most critical near-term date for Texas hemp businesses and consumers.

Running parallel to the DSHS rules litigation, the Texas Supreme Court on May 1, 2026 issued its decision in Sky Marketing Corp. v. DSHS, the so-called Delta-8 case dating from 2021. The court upheld DSHS’s authority to schedule synthetically derived THC compounds and significantly narrowed the scope of future injunctive relief. The ruling found that injunctions can only protect the specific plaintiffs who sued, not the broader industry, citing a 2025 U.S. Supreme Court precedent. This decision creates a difficult environment for future industry-wide litigation and substantially complicates the THCA injunction’s long-term viability, even as the industry continues to fight.

The court also held that the 2019 Texas hemp law did not legalize all forms of THC, and that “derivatives” in the hemp definition is not so broad as to cover lab-synthesized cannabinoids. Naturally occurring cannabis constituents remain “hemp” under the ruling, which is important context for why the THCA litigation is on a different footing than the Delta-8 case.

What happens in November at the federal level, and any possible state decision to adopt federal hemp law changes ahead of the 2027 legislative session, could dramatically alter the entire landscape regardless of how the current lawsuits resolve.

Sources

Get action alerts

We'll email you when a hearing, vote or rule needs Texans to speak up, with what to say and who to say it to.

News

Policy

Take Action

Learn

About

Donate

FacebookInstagramXLinkedInYouTube